WindyJMusic.com
  • Blog
  • Biography
    • Online Curriculum Vitae
  • Bookings
  • Contact
  • Research

New Government, same as the Old Government

3/21/2016

0 Comments

 
When the PC party of Alberta was ousted from the seats of power in Alberta, I rejoiced.  One of the demonstrations of entitlement that party showed while in 44 years of running our province was self-serving advertisements, like this one.


Every opposition party called the PC party out on this disrespect of the taxpayer’s dollar, including this party.
Picture
Picture
Hang on, isn’t that the party in power now?

Not even a year after crushing into the legislature, the Alberta NDP Government is presenting itself as the new government.

But it isn’t.  They are just as pleased with the idea of pork-barrelling as the PC party was.  They are just as pleased with using the government purse to advance their own self-interest as the PC party was.

It would be a different story, I’m sure, had that advertisement for the NDP Caucus been placed in a publication that distributes to one of their ridings.
But it wasn’t.  It was printed in High River’s publication.  Wayne Anderson, a Wildrose MLA, is our representative here.

This isn’t the first pork-barrelling experience we’ve enjoyed with this new government.  It started on day 1.  Premier Notley’s swearing-in was coupled with invitations to the non-partisan government-funded event asking for donations to the very partisan NDP.  Later in November of 2015, access to Notley was once again sold at a Calgary fundraiser, and again a similar attempt at the Alberta Art Gallery in Edmonton in February of 2016.  The NDP were cleared of wrong-doing with regards to a $10,000/ticket Ontario event featuring the Alberta Premier, although they dismissed Ethics Commissioner Marguerite Trussler’s assertion of a “perception that only a chosen few are being invited”.

Sounds awfully close to an “aura of power” assertion that happened a mere 18 months ago.

We haven’t even discussed the partisan appointments the NDP have given their friends.  An NDP Government should be expected to hire NDP party faithful to help them implement their policy and ideals.  This has happened on numerous occasions, with Brian Topp, Anne McGrath and John Heaney as examples.  However, Albertans are right to wonder if these really are the best people for the job, especially when these individuals would top a sunshine list with significant 6-figure salaries and potential severances when they are done.  The NDP should not be surprised when the eyebrows of many Albertans rise with the hiring of a Kevin Davediuk, a top union official, to negotiate with the union he is leaving.  A pro-union political party making pro-union hiring choices?  We should not be shocked.

Except that the NDP said they wouldn’t do that.

The NDP have also had far too much leeway with not understanding parliamentary rules.  One such rule is that Caucus funds are government funds from the taxpayer.  They are not to be used for partisan purposes.  And yet here we see a purely partisan NDP Caucus advertisement in a non-NDP riding.

See the similarity?  Advertisements for partisan purposes should rightly annoy Albertans, we just voted the PCs out for the exact same thing.  What’s worse, no more are the NDP “fighting for mortgage-paying jobs” than the PCs were building schools as their signs suggested.  Over 100,000 jobs are gone, and the only news that Economic Diversification Minister Deron Bilous has produced on the economic file is a bill that, as Alberta Party Leader Greg Clark suggests, does little more than “create committees”.

As a member of the Alberta Party, this pisses me off.  Albertans were right to be upset at the PCs. But now a new breed of politician in the NDP is doing the exact same thing.  Albertans should not be faulted for thinking “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me”.

What that means, though, is that no politician is trustworthy.  And no matter how hard I try to say the Alberta Party is different, because we are, I cannot prove it to you unless you give us a chance.

If Mr. Anderson were to place such an ad, I would not be opposed to it as his form of connecting with his constituents.  Although, I would never support Mr. Anderson making such a blanket claim as “fighting for mortgage-paying jobs”.  His party’s jobs-creation recommendations were either borrowed from the Alberta Party, or has nebulous goals that can never be reached.

As an example, Wildrose Recommendation 2 is to reduce red tape by 20%.  By what metric does one measure red tape?  Inches?

If the Wildrose is going to do nothing but parrot the Alberta Party’s plans, they should at least be honest about it and just put up a link to the Alberta Party website.

A jobs plan encourages businesses to create jobs.  An Investor Tax Credit will do much more than a jobs-creation tax credit.  A small business tax decrease will do much the same, as will investment in post-secondary education and research and development, or as the Wildrose calls it, “Knowledge Infrastructure”.  This is how the Alberta Party has been fighting constructively for mortgage-paying jobs.

The false advertisements come at a price.  The price is Albertans’ trust in politicians.

Check out the Alberta Party’s events for a chance to meet Alberta Party people near you.  In Highwood, the next event is March 21 at 7:30 PM at the 1906 Restaurant in High River.

​The Alberta Party is different.  Let me prove it to you.
0 Comments

Teachers should consider a 10% Rollback

3/7/2016

0 Comments

 
​On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Paige MacPherson, Alberta Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) proposed that the government seek a 10% rollback on Teachers salaries.  And you know what?  She is perfectly right to ask that question.

​In our economic reality where government revenue is heavily tied to the price of a barrel of oil, currently cheaper than a schooner of Big Rock Honey Brown, there is no money in the bank account.  Asking teachers to take such a rollback would amount to approximately $340,000,000 in the provincial coffers that would be used to ...

​to ...

um ...

Hmm.
Okay, so what does a 10% cut to teachers' salaries mean?  It means teachers are in effect taking $6,000 to $10,000 out of their paycheck and giving it back to the government.  Or, alternatively, it means approximately 4000 teacher positions will be removed across the province, which follows as a more likely outcome based on what happened in 2003.  The amount being asked of teachers is equivalent to more than the entirety of the education budget cuts in 1994 (not including the taxation powers that were removed from school boards).

Alberta Teachers are among the best paid in the country.  However, contrary to what the CTF says, taking a pay cut of 10% would not keep them as the top-paid teachers in the country, it would actually drop them from the current position of 4th behind the territories to 5th behind Ontario, almost on par with Manitoba.  Nonetheless, we're still easily in the top five, even after such a pay cut.

So let's talk about this cut in terms of return on investment.  In 1994 teachers took a 5% rollback under the then Klein-Administration with not much more than platitudes of "we'll make it better".  In my mind, sustainability doesn't last 22 years, it lasts much longer, yet here we are, with the consideration of asking teachers to give it up again.  This time, when we seriously consider the cuts, let's make sure we do it with a keener eye to not allowing the government to bring us here again in 22 years.

So teachers, as you seriously consider a 10% rollback, you must ask "if we give you this money, what are you going to do with it?"

Is the $340,000,000 going to be earmarked for fixing the economy, which is the cause of this issue in the first place?  Does the Alberta Government have a plan to diversify the economy, and get off our dependence on oil?  Investment in green energy doesn't count, that's already being funded by the carbon tax.  Neither does the eventual increase in income and corporate taxes, although they will definitely result in additional revenue for the government that is not based on oil.  However, income and corporate taxes are heavily based on, wait for it, income, so with so few Albertans earning one of those, we can't count on that revenue either.

So the answer is no to those questions?  Okay then, let's consider something else that money could be used for.

Is the $340,000,000 earmarked for a plan to reduce class complexity, including special needs, English Language Learning, impoverished or at-risk students?  Will it be used to provide professional development to help us learn how to better manage the increasing class sizes and class complexities?  If history is any indicator, the more likely result will be the loss of teacher positions, which will not ameliorate class complexity issues.  Further, with fewer Albertans earning an income, and at-risk behaviour and educational success being tied to poverty, those class complexities are only about to get even more complex.

So again, the answer is no to those questions?  Then what would this money be used for?  Convince the teachers it would be used for something!

It would be used to help the government provide services.  Services like teachers.

So hang on, if teachers concede a rollback of 10%, that 10% might just go fund ... teachers?  So what that is saying is that a teacher that makes $80,000, the CTF is suggesting the government can only afford $72,000 of their current contract if the teachers concede that rollback.  If the teachers don't concede that rollback, the government would then only be able to afford $64,000.

So take the 10%, or see 20% of your salary's worth cut from the classroom.

What that means is the CTF's proposal is not in fact a proposal, but a veiled threat.  And it's not threatening teachers most.  It's threatening students.
Yet in the same breath MacPherson claims she is the only one thinking of the children, by considering the debt burden they would likely have to shoulder.  That is a valid consideration, except for two things: children are more than numbers, and MacPherson is really just trying to write the narrative that teachers are asking for salary increases.

Teachers haven't asked for anything yet.  We're not at that stage in bargaining.  And to say teachers have asked for anything writes the narrative of your disdain for teachers.
Picture
“It is completely unnecessary to undermine the valuable work teachers do by putting them at odds with cash-strapped taxpayers with another wage debate,” says wage-debate-instigator, the 5-member Canadian Taxpayers Federation's Paige MacPherson.
From a business perspective, what we see here is absolutely no return on the investment the CTF is asking teachers to make in Alberta.

Instead, the CTF is asking teachers to manage an increase in class complexity and size, continue to deliver world-class education that other countries look to for examples of educational leadership and research (don't give me the math debate garbage, I've already debunked that), deal with a decrease in income to manage their home day-to-day expenses which often include classroom supplies, and to carry the entire weight of a faltering economy, with no plan to fix it.

What is left to convince teachers to take this rollback?  "Be considerate of your neighbours who have had paycuts and job losses, too".  A sort of "misery loves company" rationale.

Teachers help our future learn how to question, criticize, reflect, show their work, stand up for what's right, write for a purpose, read for understanding, shoot hoops, make a tower out of dry spaghetti and marshmallows, make a cooler out of cardboard and sawdust, make their parents cry as they play Shenandoah with 63 of their peers, apologize and mean it, refuse to be sorry and instead be better, and make a difference.

Which of those things would you cut to provide the misery of Albertans with more company?

Teachers are already being considerate of their fellow Albertans, as what happens to those Albertans happens to their kids.  That means that teachers are already dealing with the increased at-risk behaviour, the kids who come to school hungry because there's no food in the pantry, and the elevated expectations of parents who just don't want their kids to have to go through what they are.
Picture
Teachers are already taking a 10% rollback.  They cry every time they see another kid disadvantaged.  Its just costing teachers their souls and sanity instead of their salary.  In response to MacPherson's "won't somebody please think about the chidren" cry, teachers would not be faulted for saying "we do, every damn day."

So teachers, as you seriously consider the 10% rollback, consider these things as well; there is no plan to solve the economic issues, there is no plan to deal with classroom conditions, and you are indeed the best teachers in the world defending our future.

Make your decision with that in mind.

0 Comments
    Tweet
    Picture
    Tweets by @WindyJMusic

    Archives

    April 2019
    March 2019
    October 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All
    2013 Flood
    Abuse
    Accountable
    Advocate
    AEMA
    Agriculture
    AHRA
    Airplanes
    Aisi
    Alberta
    Alberta Human Rights
    Alberta Initiative For School Improvement
    Alberta NDP
    Alberta Party
    Alberta School Boards Association
    Alberta Teachers Association
    Alison Redford
    Art
    Arts
    Arts Education
    Asba
    Ata
    ATASC
    AUMA
    Band
    Barack Obama
    Bargaining
    Berm
    Big Listen
    Black Diamond
    Bragg Creek
    Bridge
    Bruce Masterman
    Bruce Mcallister
    Budget
    Bully
    Byelection
    Calgary
    Calgary Centre
    Calgary-Elbow
    Calgary Foothills
    Calgary Sun
    Canada
    Canadian
    Cathy Couey
    Choir
    Christian
    Chuck Shifflett
    Class Of 2014
    Community
    Competency
    Composition
    Concert Bands
    Conduct
    Conservative
    Corporate
    Corporations
    Council
    Councillor
    Craig Snodgrass
    Culture
    Curriculum
    Danielle Larivee
    Danielle Smith
    David Eggen
    David Staples
    Deron Bilous
    Diana Mcqueen
    Didsbury
    Dike
    Dirty Thirties
    Discipline
    Diversification
    Donations
    Don Moore
    Doug Griffiths
    Doug Horner
    Downtown
    Dragan Brankovich
    Drama
    Drp
    DRP Advocacy Committee
    Education
    Elbow
    Election
    Electoral Reform
    Emile Blokland
    Energy
    Environment
    Esrd
    Evan Berger
    Exshaw
    Federal
    Festival
    Fine Arts
    Flood
    Floodplain
    Floodway
    Foothills
    Forced Entry
    Fort Macleod
    Fort Mcmurray
    Fred Horne
    Gay-Straight Alliance
    Golf Course
    Gordon Dirks
    Government
    Grads
    Graduation
    Grassroots
    Green
    Greg Clark
    Greg Weadick
    GSA
    Guitar
    Gun
    Guns
    Hamptons
    High River
    Highway 63
    Highwood
    Homeless
    Honourable
    Hope
    Hotels
    Ian Donovan
    Jamie Kinghorn
    Jazz
    Jeff Johnson
    Jennifer Burgess
    Jim Morgan
    Jim Prentice
    Joe Ceci
    Joel Windsor
    John Barlow
    Justin Trudeau
    Kathy Macdonald
    Ken Hughes
    Kent Hehr
    Kerry Towle
    Keystone XL
    Lake
    Laurie Blakeman
    Legislature
    Liberal
    Liberalberta
    Liberals
    Lions
    Local
    London
    Macleod
    Mayor
    Medicine Hat
    Melissa Mathieson
    Mentally Ill
    Michelle Glavin
    Mitigation
    Mla
    Modulars
    Mount Royal
    Mru
    Municipal
    Municipalities
    Music
    Musical Theatre
    Ndp
    New Year
    NFA
    No Zero
    Nra
    OECD
    Oil
    Okotoks
    Olympics
    Parents
    Parking
    Pc
    Peter Loran
    Philosophy
    Phil Rowland
    Piano
    Pipeline
    PISA
    Police
    Political
    Politics
    Polly Knowlton Cockett
    Portables
    Practice Review
    Premier
    Privacy
    Professional
    Progressive Conservative
    Protest
    Provincial
    Question Period
    Rachel Notley
    Raj Sherman
    Rally
    Rcmp
    Reality Check
    Richard Murray
    Rick Fraser
    Ric McIver
    Rob Anderson
    Robert Prcic
    Sandy Hook
    School
    School Boards
    Scott Wagner
    Self Regulation
    Self-regulation
    Service
    Shane Schreiber
    Siksika
    Socialist
    Speaker
    Stephen Mandel
    Stompin' Tom Connors
    Strings
    Students
    Sustainable Resource Development
    Teach
    Teacher
    Theatre
    Thomas Lukaszuk
    Todd Van Vliet
    Tran-Davies
    TransCanada
    Tripartite
    Trustee
    Twin
    United States
    Urban
    Vocal
    Water
    Water For Life
    Wayne Anderson
    Wedderburn
    Western Wheel
    Wildrose
    William Munsey
    WREM

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

In my world, we don't accept "I can't." When you enter my world, you enter the realm of "I can't yet." It acknowledges a challenge, opens doors, and calls for action. Then, in my world, we act, and we always find success.

Social Media

Photo used under Creative Commons from Sam Howzit
  • Blog
  • Biography
    • Online Curriculum Vitae
  • Bookings
  • Contact
  • Research