WindyJMusic.com
  • Blog
  • Biography
    • Online Curriculum Vitae
  • Bookings
  • Contact
  • Research

Passion or Petulance

10/6/2021

1 Comment

 
The mayoral candidates' forum is tonight.  And despite the attention the media is giving to this election, it really matters.
Picture
Craig Snodgrass
Picture
Jeff Langford
I don't like to rely on the sign war, which has an obvious winner at this point.  Instead I read candidates' websites and some of their public statements.  When reading through the platforms, the two options become obvious; passion or petulance.

​
​On October 18 High River residents cast a ballot for their choice for mayor, and their two options are the incumbent Craig Snodgrass and local businessperson Jeff Langford.
Reading through Jeff Langford's website, it reeks of petulance from someone who is upset he isn't getting his way.  His website includes a diatribe from a developer who accuses incumbent and opponent Craig Snodgrass of not being developer friendly.  And yet there are many other projects that have been completed during both of Snodgrass' mayoral terms, and many more in discussions. 

Langford also bemoans issues that are not managed by Council or by a Mayor alone.  As an example, it is not the Town's job to promote businesses to residents.  A business should have its own marketing budget, and government should stay out of the way because it's not Town Council's job to build business.  It's Town Council's job to set policies and procedures that provide the services needed for business to operate, such as water, sewer, roads, and other infrastructure.  Good infrastructure makes it possible for growth, both economically and residentially.  With good infrastructure in place, business builds business.

So really, a "business-friendly" mayor is, while also only being one voice on a 7-person council, a mayor that makes infrastructure, policies and procedures happen, so that business can exist however business chooses to exist.

I slide over to Craig Snodgrass' website to see if there is counterpoint.  I see an explanation of every proposed development, including the one by the diatribal developer, and one who isn't willing to pay to make a plan by ... wait, who?  Jeff Langford?  Oh, I see.  He's running to get his own way, and to make the taxpayer's pay for plans.  I wonder if he realizes that in order to get his way, he still has to convince six councillors to agree with him.

When it comes to the Coal Policy, Langford has missed the point egregiously.  He lightly suggests that an industry that could risk harming the environment should be avoided when possible.  He suggests that an industry could be an eyesore.  Not once does he come fully out and say he opposes the Coal Mining in the headwaters of the Highwood River, the location where our potable water supply comes from.  He's missed the point, and proves to be an inadequate voice to an issue that can have serious health implications for residents.
Picture
Photo by Elsie Hui, Calgary Foodie
Langford suggests there is an accessibility issue for downtown High River.  While that may be true, the solution is not to revert back to the ugly angle parking we had pre-flood as proposed by Langford, especially because that would require ripping up roads and sidewalks to make that possible again.  I don't know about everyone else, but I am tired of ripped up roads.  Come to think of it, I'm pretty happy with the walkability of downtown; had we not had it, Colossi's wouldn't have enough sidewalk to allow for socially distanced coffee conversations (just as an example).
There is also a pool referendum underway, with the question "do you support the Town borrowing up to $15 million to expand the existing pool facility".  This is a yes or no question.  It speaks nothing of building any other facility, or committing to any other amount.  So if residents vote "no", that's the end of the conversation.  We're stuck with what we got.  However if we vote "yes" to this non-binding referendum, Council can make plans for expansion only, up to $15 million maximum with an obvious public mandate.
Picture
Aquatic Referendum on the ballot
But Langford doesn't care how High Riverites vote.  If they vote "yes", he suggests that he'd take the $15 million that would be non-bindingly approved through the pool referendum, and direct it toward a new build (that would run between $25 and $30 million plus maintenance costs of a separate facility).  He has no location planned, no design planned, no infrastructure services, no guarantee of convincing the other 6 voices on Council or the 7 voices on Foothills County Council to agree (when they already have their own facility in Aldersyde), and no plan on how to fund its maintenance after the fact, leaving High Riverites with undeniably no improvements on recreation plans for at least another 4 years if not far longer.

I find it funny how, exactly 8 years ago today, I had a similar issue with a different candidate for mayor.
What Langford is saying, basically, is "even if you vote yes to the plans they've laid out, I'm still gonna take that money and do my own plan anyway.  What is that plan?  Well, I'll make that up later, but only if the right people get voted in."  How disrespectful of the High River voter.  And how irresponsible.

After having made it through Langford's site, I have to admit I'm nervous.  As I said before, had I depended upon signage to see who has the popular vote, I'd think Snodgrass was going to lose.

Reading through Craig Snodgrass's website and Facebook feed, as well as reading through his history, his passion is obvious.  His work (along with the rest of the outgoing council) on the Coal Restriction Policy has been steadfast and strong, his advocacy for High River and the DRP post-flood has been incredible, and his ability to look many years into the future is obvious.  Certainly this kind of vision is not without a few missteps from time to time, but one can never doubt that Snodgrass works with the idea of helping High River be a place for people to grow up, live and enjoy the winters of their lives in.

I'm not interested in taking the town backwards.  Moving High River forward is not accomplished through bending to developer demands of today.  We've seen what happens when we do that with the annihilation of whole developments on flood plains.  And if that happens again, High River residents will undoubtedly be on the hook for it.  
​

Moving High River forward means looking 5, 10, 25 years into the future, making a plan for what that High River looks like, and getting started with the resources we have.  When you watch the forum tonight, I think you'll discover fairly quickly which person that is.

Updated - Video from the Forum Now Posted

1 Comment
    Tweet
    Picture

    Archives

    October 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    April 2019
    March 2019
    October 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All
    2013 Flood
    Abuse
    Accountable
    Advocate
    AEMA
    Agriculture
    AHRA
    Airplanes
    Aisi
    Alberta
    Alberta Human Rights
    Alberta Initiative For School Improvement
    Alberta NDP
    Alberta Party
    Alberta School Boards Association
    Alberta Teachers Association
    Alison Redford
    Art
    Arts
    Arts Education
    Asba
    Ata
    ATASC
    AUMA
    Band
    Barack Obama
    Bargaining
    Berm
    Big Listen
    Black Diamond
    Bragg Creek
    Bridge
    Bruce Masterman
    Bruce Mcallister
    Budget
    Bully
    Byelection
    Calgary
    Calgary Centre
    Calgary-Elbow
    Calgary Foothills
    Calgary Sun
    Canada
    Canadian
    Cathy Couey
    Choir
    Christian
    Chuck Shifflett
    Class Of 2014
    Community
    Competency
    Composition
    Concert Bands
    Conduct
    Conservative
    Corporate
    Corporations
    Council
    Councillor
    Craig Snodgrass
    Culture
    Curriculum
    Danielle Larivee
    Danielle Smith
    David Eggen
    David Staples
    Deron Bilous
    Diana Mcqueen
    Didsbury
    Dike
    Dirty Thirties
    Discipline
    Diversification
    Donations
    Don Moore
    Doug Griffiths
    Doug Horner
    Downtown
    Dragan Brankovich
    Drama
    Drp
    DRP Advocacy Committee
    Education
    Elbow
    Election
    Electoral Reform
    Emile Blokland
    Energy
    Environment
    Esrd
    Evan Berger
    Exshaw
    Federal
    Festival
    Fine Arts
    Flood
    Floodplain
    Floodway
    Foothills
    Forced Entry
    Fort Macleod
    Fort Mcmurray
    Fred Horne
    Gay-Straight Alliance
    Golf Course
    Gordon Dirks
    Government
    Grads
    Graduation
    Grassroots
    Green
    Greg Clark
    Greg Weadick
    GSA
    Guitar
    Gun
    Guns
    Hamptons
    High River
    Highway 63
    Highwood
    Homeless
    Honourable
    Hope
    Hotels
    Ian Donovan
    Jamie Kinghorn
    Jazz
    Jeff Johnson
    Jennifer Burgess
    Jim Morgan
    Jim Prentice
    Joe Ceci
    Joel Windsor
    John Barlow
    Justin Trudeau
    Kathy Macdonald
    Ken Hughes
    Kent Hehr
    Kerry Towle
    Keystone XL
    Lake
    Laurie Blakeman
    Legislature
    Liberal
    Liberalberta
    Liberals
    Lions
    Local
    London
    Macleod
    Mayor
    Medicine Hat
    Melissa Mathieson
    Mentally Ill
    Michelle Glavin
    Mitigation
    Mla
    Modulars
    Mount Royal
    Mru
    Municipal
    Municipalities
    Music
    Musical Theatre
    Ndp
    New Year
    NFA
    No Zero
    Nra
    OECD
    Oil
    Okotoks
    Olympics
    Parents
    Parking
    Pc
    Peter Loran
    Philosophy
    Phil Rowland
    Piano
    Pipeline
    PISA
    Police
    Political
    Politics
    Polly Knowlton Cockett
    Portables
    Practice Review
    Premier
    Privacy
    Professional
    Progressive Conservative
    Protest
    Provincial
    Question Period
    Rachel Notley
    Raj Sherman
    Rally
    Rcmp
    Reality Check
    Richard Murray
    Rick Fraser
    Ric McIver
    Rob Anderson
    Robert Prcic
    Sandy Hook
    School
    School Boards
    Scott Wagner
    Self Regulation
    Self-regulation
    Service
    Shane Schreiber
    Siksika
    Socialist
    Speaker
    Stephen Mandel
    Stompin' Tom Connors
    Strings
    Students
    Sustainable Resource Development
    Teach
    Teacher
    Theatre
    Thomas Lukaszuk
    Todd Van Vliet
    Tran-Davies
    TransCanada
    Tripartite
    Trustee
    Twin
    United States
    Urban
    Vocal
    Water
    Water For Life
    Wayne Anderson
    Wedderburn
    Western Wheel
    Wildrose
    William Munsey
    WREM

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

In my world, we don't accept "I can't." When you enter my world, you enter the realm of "I can't yet." It acknowledges a challenge, opens doors, and calls for action. Then, in my world, we act, and we always find success.

Social Media

Photo used under Creative Commons from Sam Howzit
  • Blog
  • Biography
    • Online Curriculum Vitae
  • Bookings
  • Contact
  • Research